Yesterday, the world’s largest social networking site,
Facebook, changed all its users email addresses to some silly, impossible to
remember number@facebook.com.
Doesn’t matter what you set your default email address to on
your contact page, it was changed to the social network’s own email system.
Thanks for telling us about the change. Hell, don’t you
knock first? Wouldn’t it have been more polite to ask us users first?
Over the years, under Zuckerberg’s leadership, Facebook has
got flack from members for making changes affecting the use of personal private information, which have created even more tension between the social network’s
top brass and various governments around the world.
Facebook has always had the pig-headed blindness to turn on
these new “features” or “enhancements” as they refer to them, forcing their
members to either turn them off, or disable them after the fact.
If it wasn’t for all the media hype around these changes, most
wouldn’t know about them – thanks Facebook for letting us know.
For years we have tolerated this rude behavior – everyone’s
on Facebook. But the social networking landscape is changing.
Twitter is still king for short status updates, YouTube is
the video social network which is always on, and dare we say Facebook is being
given a run for it’s money by Google+?
The world’s largest and most popular search engine began a
social networking service recently, called it Google+ (or G+ for short) and it
is increasingly growing as Facebook continues to give the middle finger to its
users and government regulators.
Google+ -- so far – has learned a thing or two about being
polite, and not forcing changes upon its users. G+ seems to go out of their way
to make privacy settings simple, so you know exactly what information you are
sharing and with whom. And the Google+ interface is visually stunning, placing
an emphasis on the images associated with the post, making it a joy to browse.
When most started their Facebook pages, we added everyone we
used to know, but had lost touch with, because there was no one else using
Facebook that we knew to add.
Social networking was a new world, where people were more
caught up in the ability to actually connect with old friends and family,
instead of just becoming popular.
These days, the popularity bug has bitten most social
network platforms, so it’s not who you know, it’s how many.
Just look at how quickly Pinterest has grown, thanks in part
to the positive hype, while the once popular Digg has been long since
forgotten, due to lots of negative talk on the social networks and in the media.
The more people complaining about your social network –
Facebook take note – the fewer people using your social network, and eventually
that social network dies. Myspace was once thought to take over Facebook, but
now, most don’t even mention it except when talking about social networking
relics from the past. If it wasn’t for the handful of musicians using Myspace,
it would have been dead and buried long ago.
Popularity might not be the best judge of character, but it
certainly has economic power -- if your once popular product or service
suddenly falls out of favor, people stop using it, and the business dies.
Just look at Research In Motion (RIM)’s BlackBerry – once the
primary smartphone, RIM ruled the stock market. These days, RIM is the butt of
jokes and speculation about the future of the company, as they have failed to
keep up with innovations in smartphone tech, and they have lost focus of their
primary user-base.
If Facebook continues to alienate and offend their user, as
other social networks mature and expand, eventually Facebook will be just like
RIM – barely able to float in the cyberspace sea of change.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you kindly for your feedback! All comments are reviewed prior to posting.