But in some jobs, a criminal record check really does
prevent problems for both employer and employee down the road.
Last thing a major television network wants, is to have it’s
top rated morning show host taken away in handcuffs.
But if you’ve done the time for your crime, should you be
allowed on television?
Television’s perfect home body, Martha Stewart is back on
the TV, after doing time for securities fraud.
In Canada, media baron Conrad Black may be following the
home body’s lead, as there is talk that he may get his own talk show on a cable
channel available across the nation.
Conrad Black served time for fraud as well, just a different
kind. His was to do with his newspaper empire, and made headlines in some of
those papers, as he continued to write columns while in prison.
Now he may be on the airwaves, broadcasting his thoughts on
television.
Which raises the question – should convicted criminals be
hosting television shows?
We all make mistakes, and both Stewart and Black have paid
for those mistakes by serving out their criminal sentences in prison.
But millions of people are denied even the most entry level
of jobs, because of their criminal past.
Such as the teenage mom, that can’t get a job working in a
retail store, because her criminal background check shows she was charged with
theft. What it doesn’t show is she stole a loaf of bread to feed her kid.
There are other reasons why criminals don’t usually get put
on the tube. The last thing any network president wants, is to turn on his
station, to see someone telling the world how to break the law.
It’s unlikely Black or Stewart would publicly tell others to
do something illegal. But the possibility is always there.
And our television personalities are role models for us all.
We get hooked on their energy and drive, and often mimic them.
So putting criminals on television is bad for our kids, and
ourselves.
Do we want others to follow Lance Armstrong?
Before the cyclist came forward with confessions of “doping”
while competing he was a role model to many.
Now that he’s come out and spoken publicly about his
drug-laden past, he’s on television even more – explaining himself and what he
did.
Fair enough, television does provide a forum for public
debate, and all sides should be allowed to participate.
But if someone were to offer Armstrong his own television
show, I’d question that person’s motives.
And you should too.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you kindly for your feedback! All comments are reviewed prior to posting.